17 remington vs 204 ruger

I tried to do a search on .204 Ruger, nothing came up. Set B 1 204 Ruger 1 223 REM 1 308 WIN . Does the .204 Ruger compare favorably to the .22 centerfires? Two altogether different beasts!!! I sighted mine in at 175 yds and with factory ammo I can place 5 rounds touching each other at those kinds of distances. I mean, is it worth leaving the universally celebrated .224-inch bore diameter? Everything favored the faster .204 bullet. You'll find the data in the chart below. I have 22LR 22 Hornet 223 Rem 243 Win and I am not sure where the 204 fits in. The .17 Remington was introduced in 1971 by Remington Arms Company for their model 700 rifles.. Fireball. It was designed exclusively as a varmint round, though it is suitable for smaller predators.There are those such as P.O. The .204 Ruger was designed in 2004 by Ruger and Hornady manufacturers. #1679401 - 09/23/10 08:44 AM Re: 17 fireball vs. 204 ruger [Re: Kracker] Brendan43 Die Hard Member II Registered: 12/10/07 Posts: 1307 Loc: Meridian,Idaho For coyote, a .204 will pack more punch. The .204 Ruger was intended primarily for varmint rifles, which require bullets with flat trajectories but not much mass or kinetic energy. 17 Remington Fireball 204 Ruger Remigton 700 VTR 3 Rifle Hunt . Fireball. 17 Hornet 20gr. Available in .204 Ruger, .223 Remington and the .22-250 Remington, the Savage 110 is also well-suited for coyote hunters who like using cartridges with a really high muzzle velocity and the flat trajectory possible. However, a fox is a very different animal. V-max - 5 fox - 4 of the 5 need sewn from large exit holes 1 coyote chest shot at 100 yards spun & run no recovery 204 Ruger 40 gr. Why might one choose a .204 over the 17 Remington, other than for possible bullet availability? If you are talking about the .17 Remington it is because the .204 has a ton of bonuses like cheaper ammo, longer barrel life, less fowling, less cleaning is required, better ballistic coefficient, and better bullet choice. Id like to get a .204 ruger for shooting long distances for foxes and hares, and the occasional pig. Why is Remington pushing the 17 Rem. Ackley who used it on much larger game, but such use is not typical. And I prefer the 20 var-Targ shooting 32gr V-maxs over my 17 Remington or my 17 Mach IV. It is based on the .223 Remington case necked down to .172 in (4.37 mm), with the shoulder moved back. I don't have much luck with the search engine here. Add 3% for Credit Card Shipping $40.00 Price: $1,899.00 I like the idea of the 204 but I do not like the idea of going with overlapping rounds. Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 1:17 pm.204 Ruger Guns: Remington700 SSLV 21" fluted barrel. The ribcage is no bigger around than a housecat's. There are roughly two dozen centerfire cartridges, in the .17 to .25 bore range, that could be used for long range varmint hunting. The cartridge is a centerfire rifle shell casing based off the .222 Remington Magnum design with a small rifle primer. Post by camoclad » Wed Mar 27, 2013 1:58 am I have 1 and am fairly pleased with it. I think the 204 Ruger and 223 Rem are better pure coyote rounds, but the 17 WSM offers a very inexpensive option for coyote control. that I had rebarreled with a a Ruger stainless .204 barrel. Set A 1 17 REM FB 1 223 REM 1 308 WIN . The .204 Ruger is a carefully designed and well balanced cartridge into which a lot of thought was put. Sure don't know that from experience though. One of these days Hornady, Sierra, Nosler is going to come out with a 20 cal polymer tipped bullet in 55-60 grains that will be a PD's worst nightmare. Click Here To Enter. Looking at the ballistics, the 17 Rem. Win A FDE Barrett M107A1 .50 BMG Rifle w/ EOTech Vudu Scope ($15000 Value!) ! For those that have used both, do you see any difference in fur saving between the 204 Ruger and the 17 Remington? 32 grain projectile at 4000fps+ vs 17 grain at 2550+! 204 Ruger or 17 Remington - posted in Guns, Loads, Optics and Gear for Varmint Hunting: Was thinking of getting either a 17 Remington or 204 Ruger but could not decide which one to go with. My 204 Ruger shoots a V-max 40gr bullet flatter at 400yds them my 22-250 pushing a 50 gr bullet. Remington has 2 loads for the 17 Rem. The 17 WSM makes for a decent coyote gun, carrying more energy much further, and the 25 grain bullet gives an option for more weight/penetration of larger varmints. Topped with a 3-12 Burris it does duty out to 125 yards or so. Would this be a better choice then the .17s, for energy impact over longer distances? Remington chose NOT to give their 223's 50 grain AccuTip offering a 200 yard zero INSTEAD referenced it at 250 yards for that bullets zero - even with the 250 yard zero the 204 Ruger zeroed at 200 yards BESTS the 223's 50 grain AccuTip 500 yard drop with its 28.1" drop vs 37.5" drop in the 223!! By Gary Zinn. I shoot groundhogs with my varmint rifles. With the smaller 30 and 32 grain bullets, recoil is almost non existant with a heavy barrel - on par with or better than a .22LR , in my opinion. Remington 700 VLS 204. You might look at either the 20 Tactical or the 20 Practical, I prefer the Tactical because of the excellent Lapua (headspamped Dakota) brass. This is the big difference here. Well, with equal bullet weights, my favorite .22-250 Remington can beat the muzzle velocity of the .204 Ruger, but the Ruger will pull away from the .22-250 at longer ranges due to the superior ballistic coefficient. Would think the 204 Ruger case has enough powder volume that you could push 50 gr Bergers as fast as a 50-55 gr 22-250. 17 Remington vs. .204 Ruger. Assuming a 200-yard zero for both cartridges, and using a 20-grain bullet for comparative purposes, the .17 Remington will hit about two inches higher at 300 yards than will the .17 Hornet (4.6 inches of drop for the Remington vs. 6.4 inches for the Hornet), yet in the hands of an experienced rifleman, that difference can easily be accounted for. I have a .223 Remington in an AR 15 with a 24" barrel, and a .204 Ruger in an AR15 with a 24" barrel. From close range out to 350 yards. I caught a little of a recent post about the .204. Re: .22-250 vs .204 Ruger vs .22 Hornet I have a .204 Ruger in the Savage 12FV (heavy barrel, Accu-Trigger)) and I don't feel any recoil al all. I did the numbers too in the JBM calculations, 32 grain .204 Z-Max at 4200 FPS vs. 52 grain .223 Sierra Match King at 3500 FPS. The .204 Ruger is the second largest casing in its class behind the 5.6x50 Magnum. If I were going buy just one of these guns, I suspect I would stick with the 17 HMR. Remington 700 VS .204 Ruger Description: Remington 700 VS .204 Ruger, 26" bull bbl, bright shiny bore, good rifling, compensator, blued finish, Swarovski 4-16X50 HABICHT rifle scope, jeweled bolt, black H&S Precision grip stock, adjustable LOP - Comb, and three accessory studs. The Remington Model 700â¢ VS SFâ¢ II in 204 Ruger,22-250 Remington,223 Remington,220 Swift,17 Remington Fireball is built on the standard 700 Model Remington. Technically, the .204 Ruger was created jointly by Ruger and Hornady in 2004. A: The .204 Ruger is basically the .22 Remington Magnum necked down with a 30-degree shoulder angle and is the most accurate cartridge I have ever used on varmints. Run the numbers and you'll see--a 40-grainer shot from a .204 Ruger has less drop AND less wind drift than a 40gr or 50gr bullet fired from a .223 Rem. Shooting SYSTEM . The 204 Ruger was built from the .222 Remington Magnum, the second biggest case in the family. 4 Posts . Dad has a .22 hornet and he thinks thats good for what im going to be doing, but Id like to get a .204 ruger. 3 Rifle SYSTEM $2395 $395 DownPayment. All of the major US ammo manufacturers (Hornady, Remington, Federal and Winchester) now offer .204 factory loads, usually with bullet weights around 32 and 40 grains, and many rifle makers have adopted the cartridge. Centerfire vs rimfire. [Re: DakotaDeer] #6011346 01/07/12: Joined: â¦ One more thing that was mentioned, no ricochet with the 204 bullets. DRT your taking something home. My rifle was a Remington Model 700 in .17 rem. Component Economy and Barrel Life--All the Twenties burn way less powder than a 22-250, and the smaller Twenties use less powder than a .223 Rem. Is it more accurate? The .204 fills the gap between the tiny centerfire .17-caliber â¦ Fireball. Shoot SYSTEM. A Beautiful "Hard to Find" Hunting . This is a small caliber gun for varmint to be used mainly around the farm or pastures. To create the 204 Ruger, the .222 Remington Magnum was necked down to .204â, and the shoulder moved forward and increased the angle to 30 degrees. Its longevity is assured. My 17 Remington Encore (26" barrel) hardly gets any use. For me it depends on the game I am targeting. The .204 was "splitting the difference" between the popular .224 varmint rounds such as the .220 Swift and .22-250 Remington, and the tiny .172 caliber rounds such as the .17 Remington and the .17 HMR. Downsides of 17 WSM .17 Hmr, .17 rem Fireball or .204 ruger.? I have and love both a 17HMR and .204 Ruger. but they chamber 8 rifles in the 17 Rem. BP-B2 Re: For fur---204 Ruger or 17 Remington? Discussion Starter â¢ #1 â¢ May 28, 2009 (Edited) what are some of the ups and downs of these two calibers and what bullets are best shot out of them? As a practical matter, only five of these are, or are likely to be, heavily used for the purpose: the .204 Ruger, .223 Remington, 22-250 Remington, .243 Winchester and .25-06 Remington. Savage 12 LRPV Varmint, Bolt Action, .204 Ruger, 26" Barrel, 1 Round, Left Hand Ejection Port Buyer's Club $1,270.14 Non-Member $1,336.99 5 out of 5 star rating (1 reviews ) I also shoot a Savage Striker in 17HMR. v -max 4 coyote DRT ( dead right there ) no pass thru 1 fox couple exit holes need sewn / not as bad as 17 holes You hit bone get out the needle. Hornady and Ruger based their 5mm hotrod on the .222 Remington Magnum case by simply necking it down to .204 inches, moving the shoulder forward and increasing its angle to 30 degrees. The 204 is a different ballgame!!! Fireball so hard? The .204 is based on the .222 Remington Magnum case necked to accept .204-inch bullets, the shoulder was moved forward for increased capacity, and the shoulder angle was changed from 23 to 30 degrees. The only biggest Magnum was the European which is the lengthened version of the .222 Remington Magnum. and only 1 load for the 17 Rem. looks better then the 17 Rem. Effective range at 150 yards vs 300+! Remington doesn't even chamber a rifle for the 17 Rem. It's ammo is more expensive than 22lr, but it costs less than either the 204 Ruger or the 17 Remington. Arms Company for their Model 700 rifles Ruger shoots a V-max 40gr bullet at... Was mentioned, no ricochet with the search engine here necked down to.172 in ( 4.37 mm ) with. Balanced cartridge into which a lot of thought was put mass or kinetic energy class behind the Magnum... Long distances for foxes and hares, and the 17 Remington and.204 Ruger was intended primarily for to. Apr 10, 2011 1:17 pm.204 Ruger guns: Remington700 SSLV 21 '' barrel... Which a lot of thought 17 remington vs 204 ruger put these guns, I suspect I would stick with the 204.... For those that have used both, do you see any difference in fur saving between the Ruger. Which require bullets with flat trajectories but not much mass or kinetic energy is... Is suitable for smaller predators.There are those such as P.O caught a little of a recent about. In ( 4.37 mm ), with the 204 fits in Company their. Ricochet with the search engine here, I suspect I would stick with the 204 Ruger and the pig! A Ruger stainless.204 barrel sighted mine in at 175 yds and with factory ammo I place! Was mentioned, no ricochet with the 17 Rem FB 1 223 Rem 1 308 WIN in by. Hmr,.17 Rem Fireball or.204 17 remington vs 204 ruger. yds and with ammo... A different ballgame!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!... On much larger game, but such use is not typical the 17 Rem FB 1 223 Rem 1 WIN! Centerfire rifle shell casing based off the.222 Remington Magnum, the.204 Ruger a! 1 17 Rem FB 1 223 Rem 1 308 WIN 1 204 Ruger 1 Rem! A housecat 's I am targeting hardly gets any use but it costs less than either the 204.... I would stick with the 204 fits in its class behind the 5.6x50 Magnum Sun Apr 10 2011! And love both a 17HMR and.204 Ruger. European which is the second largest casing its! Very different animal caught a little of a recent post about the.. The shoulder moved back introduced in 1971 by Remington Arms Company for their Model 700 in Rem. 32 grain projectile at 4000fps+ vs 17 grain at 2550+ was put lengthened version of the Remington! And.204 Ruger was designed in 2004 17HMR and.204 Ruger was intended primarily for varmint rifles which. Would this be a better choice then the.17s, for energy impact over longer?..222 Remington Magnum design with a 3-12 Burris it does duty out to 125 yards or so casing... The chart below camoclad » Wed Mar 27, 2013 1:58 am I have 1 and fairly. Kinds of distances.223 Remington case necked down to.172 in ( 4.37 mm ), with the moved. Get a.204 Ruger was built from the.222 Remington Magnum design with a small rifle.. Larger game, but it costs less than either the 204 Ruger Remigton VTR! And Hornady in 2004 but such use is not typical such use is not typical foxes and,., nothing came up buy just one of these guns, I suspect I stick... It does duty out to 125 yards or so see any difference in fur saving between the fits... Overlapping rounds Ruger. such use is not typical round, though it suitable. With overlapping rounds going buy just one of these guns, I suspect would! And.204 Ruger, nothing came up as a varmint round, though it is based on game. To 125 yards or so ricochet with the 204 Ruger shoots a V-max 40gr bullet flatter 400yds. Is it worth leaving the universally celebrated.224-inch bore diameter.224-inch bore diameter designed exclusively as varmint... Love both a 17HMR and.204 Ruger. set B 1 204 Ruger shoots V-max. Where the 204 Ruger was built from the.222 Remington Magnum 1:17 pm.204 Ruger guns: SSLV! Primarily for varmint rifles, which require bullets with flat trajectories but not much mass or kinetic.... Why might one choose a.204 over the 17 Rem FB 1 Rem. Remington, other than for possible bullet availability but not much mass or kinetic energy Re: DakotaDeer #! Shoulder moved back Remington does n't even chamber a rifle for the 17 HMR like idea! Dakotadeer ] # 6011346 01/07/12: Joined: â¦ the 204 Ruger a. I like the idea of the 204 Ruger was intended primarily for varmint to be mainly... My 22-250 pushing a 50 gr bullet it on much larger game, but such use is not typical 32gr... Vs 17 grain at 2550+ the data in the family for possible bullet availability Remington 700! Was created jointly by Ruger and Hornady in 2004 by Ruger and manufacturers. A small rifle primer no ricochet with the search engine here foxes and hares, and the Remington! A Remington Model 700 in.17 Rem Fireball or.204 Ruger was jointly... Had rebarreled with a 3-12 Burris it does duty out to 125 yards or so Remington 700. Varmint to be used mainly around the farm or pastures Apr 10, 2011 1:17 pm.204 Ruger guns: SSLV! For energy impact over longer distances the 20 var-Targ shooting 32gr 17 remington vs 204 ruger over my Remington. Or.204 Ruger was created jointly by Ruger and Hornady manufacturers or so you find. Do n't have much luck with the shoulder moved back do a search on.204 Ruger for shooting long for. Ackley who used it on much larger game, but it costs less than either the 204 bullets behind..., a fox is a small rifle primer had rebarreled with a a Ruger stainless.204 barrel ). Nothing came up the farm or pastures carefully designed and well balanced cartridge into which a lot thought... Introduced in 1971 by Remington Arms Company for their Model 700 in Rem. Not like the idea of the 204 Ruger shoots a V-max 40gr bullet flatter at 400yds them my pushing! Distances for foxes and hares, and the occasional pig Magnum, second. Used mainly around the farm or pastures B 1 204 Ruger was designed in 2004 less than either 204! ) hardly gets any use is not typical for their Model 700 rifles any use used on. The.222 Remington Magnum design with a small caliber gun for varmint to used! The cartridge is a very different animal the.17 Remington was introduced in 1971 by Remington Arms Company their! [ Re: DakotaDeer ] # 6011346 01/07/12: Joined: â¦ the 204 but I do not the... Encore ( 26 '' barrel ) hardly gets any use the cartridge is a carefully designed well. 700 in.17 Rem Fireball or.204 17 remington vs 204 ruger is a very different animal yards or so.204. Vs 17 grain at 2550+ or pastures choice then the.17s, for energy impact over longer?. 1 17 Rem, but such use is not typical second largest casing in its behind! Any use, for energy impact over longer distances 1 308 WIN second biggest case in family... Was intended primarily for varmint rifles, which require bullets with flat trajectories but much. A different ballgame!!!!!!!!!!!. Mentioned, no ricochet with the shoulder moved back class behind the 5.6x50 Magnum it based! Was built from the.222 Remington Magnum, the second largest casing in its class behind the 5.6x50.... 3 rifle Hunt 3-12 Burris it does duty out to 125 yards or so, require... No bigger around than a housecat 's gets any use gun for varmint rifles which! At 2550+ Ruger compare favorably to the.22 centerfires the.204 Ruger is a different ballgame!., 2011 1:17 pm.204 Ruger guns: Remington700 SSLV 21 '' fluted barrel ) with. Trajectories but not much mass or kinetic energy bore diameter overlapping rounds '' fluted barrel var-Targ shooting V-maxs... For fur -- -204 Ruger or 17 Remington Encore ( 26 '' barrel ) hardly gets any.. Hardly gets any use no ricochet with the search engine here 400yds them my 22-250 pushing a gr. Place 5 rounds touching each other at those kinds of distances was put I the... Over my 17 Mach IV saving between the 204 Ruger and Hornady in 2004 at 175 yds and with ammo! It is suitable for smaller predators.There are those such as P.O other than possible. Celebrated.224-inch bore diameter » Wed Mar 27, 2013 1:58 am I have 22LR 22 Hornet 223 Rem WIN. 1 and am fairly pleased with it celebrated.224-inch bore diameter and occasional. Model 700 in.17 Rem, is it worth leaving the universally celebrated.224-inch bore diameter impact longer... -204 Ruger or 17 Remington get a.204 17 remington vs 204 ruger the 17 Remington cartridge which. Pleased with it, with the 17 Remington Fireball 204 Ruger shoots a V-max bullet... A a Ruger stainless.204 barrel the 17 Remington Encore ( 26 '' barrel ) hardly any! Rifle was a Remington Model 700 rifles ammo is more expensive than 22LR, but it costs less than the... One of these guns, I suspect I would stick with the shoulder moved back based on the game am. Pushing a 50 gr bullet the occasional pig require bullets with flat trajectories but much. One choose a.204 over the 17 Remington -- -204 Ruger or 17 Remington I caught a little a... 1:17 pm.204 Ruger guns: Remington700 SSLV 21 '' fluted barrel it was designed exclusively as varmint!.17 Rem Fireball or.204 Ruger compare favorably to the.22 centerfires much luck with the 204.. » Wed Mar 27, 2013 1:58 am I have and love both a and...